Is This Election Day Good for Women or Bad for Women?

OK, so this is a little blatant self-promotion, because I’m very honored to have been quoted extensively by Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Connie Schultz in her column “On Balance, Progress for Women” today.

Connie called me Sunday evening fretting about the Gawker kerfluffle about Christine O’Donell’s sexual and shaving practices. Personally, I said, I’ve declined to write or talk about it because I don’t want to make either Gawker or O’Donnell more important than they are.

So we quickly moved on to how this election day will reflect upon women in politics and impact progressive women’s agenda priorities. Here’s our conversation as she reported it, quite accurately:

“Gloria,” I said. “Gloria, Gloria.”

Patiently, she waited for a verb.

INTENTIONING

Sex, Power, Pandemics, and How Women
Will Take The Lead for (Everyone’s) Good

The new book from Gloria Feldt about the future, taking the leadership lessons learned from this disruption and creating a better world for all through the power of intention.

“What do we make of this sexist coverage of women? Why does it persist — even from supposedly liberal guys? How do we change this?”

I could hear Feldt take a deep breath.

“Connie,” she said. “There’s good news here.”

Her list:

No. 1: Women candidates are no longer on their own.

“We learned from Hillary Clinton’s race,” Feldt said. “There are so many organizations watching the media now. Each time this happens, they call it to the public’s attention.” [NB: of course, I mentioned the Name It Change It Campaign specifically but Connie was wise to me promoting some of my favorite organizations]

No. 2: Women candidates are increasingly fearless.

“They don’t let the attacks stop them,” she said. “And because of that, we now know that leadership comes in a turquoise pantsuit with changing hairdos and a higher-pitched voice. We’ve seen women become secretary of state and speaker of the House. We know what women can do.”

No. 3: Threaten power, and power attacks.

“I tell women all the time, ‘If they’re attacking you, they’re paying attention to you. They’re telling you that you’re important.'”

As Feldt and I talked, it became clear that this column should end with a call to action for women and the men who love them. So, here it is:

Get moving.

It takes action to create a movement, and you don’t have to run for office to make a difference in the lives of women who do.

Feldt suggests that each person make a list of 10 media outlets and put it next to his or her computer. The goal is to send two e-mails a day: One to a news organization or blog that got the story right, and another to one that got it wrong.

It’s a lot to ask, I know, when most of us are so busy. But it could change the lives of women we haven’t even met yet.

Feldt said she often tells women, “What you do is going to be somebody’s else’s history.”

So, think about it.

What kind of history will you make today?

I especially love Connie’s last line. I am in awe when a columnist comes up with such a perfect ending that delivers exactly the punch she intended.

But please read the full column and tell me what you think: is this election good or bad for women? Where do you see the balance? Am I too optimistic? What do you think? How would you answer Connie’s questions?

It’s critically important that women who are politically progressive have this conversation now. Because while the election will be history tomorrow, the future is still ours to shape.

3 Comments

  1. Serena on November 2, 2010 at 12:00 pm

    Such important questions – I think that on the one hand, it’s great that there are more women running for office, and that they’re getting national attention. Who knew that Sarah Palin would become such a force to be reckoned with? On the other hand, many of the women running are not advancing platforms that are good for other women. It kind of send the message that women will be accepted if they play on the terms set by the men. Sounds like a lot of same-old, same-old . . . just with lipstick this time.

    I really like your suggestion of writing 2 e-mails a day to call out sexist media coverage, and give a tip of the hat to folks who get it right. I don’t know that I could commit to 10 media outlets, but 6 is doable.

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by NU Women's Center, Serena Freewomyn and Serena Freewomyn, Gloria Feldt. Gloria Feldt said: New post: Is This Election Day Good for Women or Bad for Women? http://bit.ly/9nabWA #NoExcuses […]

  3. Gloria Feldt on November 2, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    Some comments from Facebook and twitter…

    #
    Becky Kruse Gjendem That’s one of the things I like about you … your optimism. 😉
    about an hour ago ·
    #
    Barbara Loader Singhaus Right on target Gloria, I just posted the article as well.

    KristinMaschka Just rt, bc people need aspiration & hope to act RT @gloriafeldt: Was I too optimistic? http://t.co/2zXYSX6 http://t.co/A10IngR #NoExcuses

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.