Uncover (the Truth About) Abortion Coverage to End the Deceptive Health Reform Dance
I wrote this commentary for The Daily Beast–please go there to comment and share too!
I felt that it was way past time for someone to call out the cynical politicians who won’t vote for health reform under any circumstances but are using women’s bodies as a rallying cry to whip up the anti-choice right. Shamefully, President Obama and most of the Democrats are dancing to their tune, and will continue to unless we voters speak out and insist that abortion and other reproductive health care is covered fairly along with other basic medical care.
They named it “The Abortion-Controversy Hoax.” Probably a better, shorter title than mine.
It’s September. Congress will soon return to tackle health care reform, and I can’t help but notice a familiar political two-step. If you want to see whether a politician–Democrat or Republican–can cut a rug, just ask him or her about abortion. They’ll swing around faster than Tom DeLay on Dancing With the Stars.
Partisans on the right mobbed town halls during the August recess to exploit abortion and women’s health, whipping up controversy around President Obama’s health reform plan. Twisted logic and deliberate misinformation abound in a YouTube ad campaign by the Family Research Council, which, along with other anti-choice groups, also launched a paid media blitz claiming Obama’s health reform plan would pull Granny’s plug while covering abortion—ignoring that most of us grannies want to make advance directives and would be quite grateful if our health plans covered the service.
Meanwhile, Democrats were doing a dance of their own and, without Senator Ted Kennedy to lead them toward their higher principles, tried unsuccessfully to waltz away from the hot-button issue with the Blue Dogs to whom they owe their souls and their majority. No wonder voters are increasingly questioning Obama’s plan.
The media has taken the bait. Time magazine asked, “Could Abortion Coverage Sink Health-Care Reform?” then answered its own question: “How Abortion Could Imperil Health-Care Reform.”
The million-dollar question is: why?
I’ll give you an answer and won’t charge you a dime. This isn’t about abortion at all. It’s about derailing healthcare reform by any means necessary. And if the health and lives of women are collateral damage, well, that’s two for the price of one.
That’s why it’s essential to uncover abortion—specifically the truth behind its place in the healthcare debate.
Start by uncovering the numbers. Despite claims that covering abortion causes or encourages it, facts show the opposite. Countries like France, Germany, and The Netherlands routinely cover abortion in their national health plans, and have some of the lowest abortion rates in the world. Conversely, countries such as Brazil, where abortion isn’t covered because it’s illegal and birth control is hard to get, have the highest rates of abortion, and the highest maternal death rates.
Next let’s uncover how Americans really feel about reproductive services and their health care coverage. Contrary to those apocalyptic headlines, the Washington-based Mellman Group’s national poll released in July confirms voters overwhelmingly (71% yes, 21% no) support requiring coverage of women’s reproductive health services. If reform eliminated current insurance coverage of birth control or abortion, nearly two-thirds would oppose the plan. Even when presented with opposition arguments, two-thirds still supported requiring coverage of abortions, agreeing that health care, not politics, should drive coverage decisions. Americans tend to be fair-minded, after all.
Uncover the myth that abortion is outside mainstream medicine. It’s one of the most common surgical procedures in America. Almost half of all women will have an unintended pregnancy during their lifetimes and 1/3 of women—60 percent of them mothers of one or more children already–will have abortions, the Guttmacher institute reports. Three-fourths cite their sense of responsibility to others when they choose abortion. That’s a far cry from anti-choice images of wanton hussies who terminate pregnancies for “convenience,” or, the opposite, of women as gullible victims of ghoulish doctors. Yet when abortion is covered, women who choose abortion do so earlier in their pregnancy, and with less risk to their health. No wonder 87% of private plans currently cover it.
Uncover the truth about those who don’t just wish to prevent abortions but want to control women’s bodies, period. If they were genuinely concerned about preventing abortions, they’d join the president’s quest to find “common ground” on birth control and sex education—proven abortion antidotes. Instead, many of the same politicians who, like Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA), threaten to derail reform under the guise of opposing abortion, also oppose family planning programs, and are least likely to vote to help children after they are born. They even made sure family planning services were tossed from the first stimulus bill (unfortunately President Obama danced along.) Call me crazy, but I thought helping families plan how many children they can support was the fiscally conservative position. And isn’t there something wrong with a party recently caught in one sex scandal after another, preaching the immorality of providing safe and affordable reproductive health care for women?
Don’t get me wrong. I like to dance. I just don’t like seeing our leaders pirouette over our rights, our health, and our freedoms. Any valid health reform plan should respect women enough to provide the full range of reproductive health care, including abortion, without shame or blame.
Opponents of health reform will keep throwing abortion up as cynical roadblock—but voters are smarter than that. They know the real issue is ensuring that every American has access to quality, affordable healthcare, including reproductive healthcare that’s fair to women. We must keep pressing to get it this time, no matter how fast some politicians dance to the tune of special interests striving to keep the current high-cost, low-coverage system.

GLORIA FELDT is the New York Times bestselling author of several books including No Excuses: 9 Ways Women Can Change How We Think About Power, a sought-after speaker and frequent contributor to major news outlets, and the Co-Founder and President of Take The Lead. People has called her “the voice of experience,” and among the many honors she has been given, Vanity Fair called her one of America’s “Top 200 Women Legends, Leaders, and Trailblazers,” and Glamour chose her as a “Woman of the Year.”
As co-founder and president of Take The Lead, a leading women’s leadership nonprofit, her mission is to achieve gender parity by 2025 through innovative training programs, workshops, a groundbreaking 50 Women Can Change The World immersive, online courses, a free weekly newsletter, and events including a monthly Virtual Happy Hour program and a Take The Lead Day symposium that reached over 400,000 women globally in 2017.
6 Comments
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Gloria,
The anti-abortion groups are funded by the multi-billion dollar adoption industry in the US. If they do away with legal abortions AND teach abstinence only sex ed in schools – they have an unending supply of product. Follow the money trail and then you will have a story not heard since the book “The Baby Thief” – The Untold Story of Georgia Tann the BAby Seller Who Corrupted Adoption by Barbara Bisantz Raymond was published.
http://harlowmonkey.typepad.com/harlows_monkey/2009/09/coercing-women-to-give-up-children-for-adoption-in-the-name-of-christianity.html
Thanks for this additional important point.
Obama sounds rather determined to disassociate health reform from abortion funding. The NYT quoted him today in an article ironically entitled In Health Care Battle, a Truce on Abortion.
Thanks a lot, Obama. Once again Democrats sacrifice the best interests of women, and for what? Gee, I had hoped they would repeal the Hyde Amendment! I knew better than to expect that, but a woman can dream, right?
Aletha, I’ll add to your point that by failing to challenge Obama, the pro-choic emovement seems complicit in compromising away the lives, health, and righs of women. A a moment when they should indeed be working to eliminate the Hyde amendment, progressives, feminists, and pro-choice leaders seem to have been rendered mute.Why? Can we expect politicians to take a stance when activists aren’t speaking up to support them on it?
Yea right, What about the labor unions, George Soros, Trial lawyers, and move on.org You guys have your special interest groups too.
I do not know what is fair to expect from politicians, but certainly not all feminists have been mute about this. The National Women’s Health Network issued an alert in July. Now it appears to be a done deal.
It is possible the pro-choice organizations figure the Freedom of Choice Act will make this moot. Still, I think feminists have every right to expect an avowedly pro-choice feminist President not to support this ban on federal funding for abortions. After saying on the campaign trail the Freedom of Choice Act would be the first bill he would sign, then downplaying its priority soon after taking office, he now insists on continuing the funding ban. The trend is ominous. I do not think this can all be blamed on feminist silence, though perhaps Obama might reconsider his priorities if enough women started raising hell. Are the mainstream organizations so attached to their newfound seat at the table that they are afraid of antagonizing Obama if they demand too much from him? I think Obama is showing his spine; he is perfectly willing to stand up to feminists if it will get him some Republican votes for this much more important business he calls health reform!