This week three New Jersey teenage girls successfully campaigned to get—for the first time in history—an equal number of male and female journalists to conduct the upcoming presidential debates.
Also this week, women rule in Hawaii. Emily’s List congratulated U.S. Congresswoman Mazie Hirono (D-HI) on her U.S. Senate primary victory over former Rep. Ed Case and Congressional candidate Tulsi Gabbard‘s primary win over Mufi Hannemann for Hirono’s vacated seat. Hirono will face a tough general election race in November against Republican ex-governor Linda Lingle, while the Daily Kos is so sure Democrat Gabbard will be a shoe-in general election victory that they don’t even name her opponent.
And whereas Hillary Clinton was damned if she did and damned even more if she didn’t dress and act certain male-defined ways, in the Political Animals era, the time has come when women benefit from running as themselves rather than trying to show stereotypically male characteristics.
As reported in Politico, “Republican U.S. Senate candidate Linda McMahon is making a second run for office just two years after the World Wrestling Entertainment boss spent $50 million of her personal fortune and still lost to now-Sen. Richard Blumenthal. McMahon is making major efforts to rehab her image as a softer, more personalized candidate. It’s a far cry from her tough-talking business woman stance she showed in 2010—an image that comes with considerable baggage. Besides claims from former wrestlers about the terrible business practices of WWE, there is a cache of embarrassing WWE performance videos, including one of McMahon slapping her daughter.”
Politico Arena asked whether McMahon is a more viable Senate candidate this time around.
Women of Linda McMahon’s age (and mine, just to assert that is not a pejorative) often believed they had to act like men to succeed in the business or political world. Remember severe navy suits and floppy bow ties of “dressing for success?” That must have been especially true in her testosterone-drenched world of wrestling. McMahon’s past management behavior and her extreme right-wing political views are classic co-opted woman characteristics.
Along the way of time and change, it turns out that the leadership qualities of women who are authentically themselves instead of pseudo-men are exactly the qualities that make for better governance (according to the World Bank) and better business success (according to Ernst and Young, McKinsey, etc.)
So it’s not surprising that after a bruising first political try, McMahon is now trying to burnish off those hard masculinized edges that worked for her early in her career. It’s not going to help her though. First, she’s too searingly branded as tough-mean-Linda into the voters’ minds. And second, despite her colorful 2012 wardrobe, her well- documented rough practices boggle the mind of anyone trying to imagine her as a newly hatched softer, more feminine butterfly.
But for women candidates in general, there are important lessons to be learned about the value of running authentically from McMahon’s too-late metamorphosis.
Latest posts by Gloria Feldt (Posts)
- It’s not the mountain that trips you, it’s the pebble. - July 2, 2014
- Are Leadership Messes Women’s Opportunity? - June 20, 2014
- Power and Leadership: Storify Your #SummerofPower - June 3, 2014