As the Republican National Convention highlights women on its convention speaking schedule, the speculation about who Romney will choose as his running mate has crept back onto the media screen.
According to Politico, The Republican National Committee has announced that Condoleezza Rice, Mike Huckabee, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez are among those expected to address the Republican convention – all but knocking them off of the vice presidential contenders list if usual rules are followed.
Observes Politico’s Arena question today, “That leaves several expected contenders in the mix, including former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty, Sen. Rob Portman (Ohio), House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (Wis.), Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.
“While Christie is rumored to be the keynote speaker, nothing has been confirmed. Despite the buzz, he has said in the past that he is not vice presidential material.”
Whoever the veep choice might be, I’ll bet Romney would love for us to be speculating on his vice presidential pick instead of where his tax returns are and whether he paid taxes during the years he refuses to disclose.
There’s no reason why someone who is speaking at the convention couldn’t be chosen, despite tradition, and if Romney wanted to do a stunner who might actually bring him new constituencies, he’d pick Martinez. But he’s too cookie-cutter for that. My money is on one of the “P’s,” Portman or Pawlenty, with a slim (oops) chance for the more bombastic Christie.
Who do you think Romney should choose for a running mate? Why? And what difference would it make to the race in your opinion?
Latest posts by Gloria Feldt (Posts)
- It’s not the mountain that trips you, it’s the pebble. - July 2, 2014
- Are Leadership Messes Women’s Opportunity? - June 20, 2014
- Power and Leadership: Storify Your #SummerofPower - June 3, 2014