If Bush Decides Contraception is Abortion, it Must Be True, Right?

by Gloria Feldt on July 17th, 2008
in Activism, Reproductive Health and tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Why would anybody be surprised that the Bush administration plans to propose new federal regulations allowing health care providers to run roughshod over established scientific and medical  principles, even when they are doing it with your taxpayer money?

After all, Bush’s first official act after taking office was to issue an executive order reinstating the global gag rule, which prevents international family planning programs receiving U. S. Funding from even uttering the word abortion.  Why would anybody be surprised that an administration willing to breach medical ethics by preventing doctors from giving patients full information about their health care options is also willing in its waning days to go the second mile for its zealous anti-choice base and redefine medical ethics to suit their ideology? Even to redefine important forms of contraception as abortion?

The right has made sexual matters unspeakable while the left and center have made it a central tenet to keep these matters private. No wonder that even the public discussion of reproductive issues so often gets giggles and Bush’s minions get a free ride as they go about their merry way to steamroller science with their ideology.

Here’s some of the text of the proposed regulations, explained by Cristina Page’s excellent analysis on RHRealityCheck:

In a spectacular act of complicity with the religious right, the Department of Health and Human Services Monday released a proposal that allows any federal grant recipient to obstruct a woman’s access to contraception. In order to do this, the Department is attempting to redefine many forms of contraception, the birth control 40% of Americans use, as abortion. Doing so protects extremists under the Weldon and Church amendments. Those laws prohibit federal grant recipients from requiring employees to help provide or refer for abortion services. The “Definitions” section of the HHS proposal states,

Abortion: An abortion is the termination of a pregnancy. There are two commonly held views on the question of when a pregnancy begins. Some consider a pregnancy to begin at conception (that is, the fertilization of the egg by the sperm), while others consider it to begin with implantation (when the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus). A 2001 Zogby International American Values poll revealed that 49% of Americans believe that human life begins at conception. Presumably many who hold this belief think that any action that destroys human life after conception is the termination of a pregnancy, and so would be included in their definition of the term “abortion.” Those who believe pregnancy begins at implantation believe the term “abortion” only includes the destruction of a human being after it has implanted in the lining of the uterus.

The proposal continues,

Both definitions of pregnancy inform medical practice. Some medical authorities, like the American Medical Association and the British Medical Association, have defined the term “established pregnancy” as occurring after implantation. Other medical authorities present different definitions. Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, for example, defines pregnancy as “[t]he state of a female after conception and until the termination of the gestation.” Dorland’s Medical Dictionary defines pregnancy, in relevant part, as “the condition of having a developing embryo or fetus in the body, after union of an oocyte and spermatozoon.

“I will do everything in my power to restrict abortions.” George W. Bush said in Oct 22, 1994 when he was running for governor or Texas. No one should be surprised then at this latest assault. He is merely continuing to deliver on his promise.

But do not be confused by what the real agenda is, because it’s not about abortion at all.  If you’re a woman, it’s about you.

More on this and what you can do about it next. Meanwhile, here’s the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association’s action alert with a letter you can send to DHHS Secretary Mike Leavitt.

Update on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 at 05:58PM by Registered CommenterGloria Feldt
Update and Action Item from National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association
Congressional Leaders Decry Draft HHS Regulations—and How You Can Take Action
As you know, it became public last week that in its final hours in office, the Bush Administration is considering promulgating regulations that, if implemented, could drastically restrict access to contraceptive services and severely harm women’s health. The draft regulations radically expand the scope and reach of provisions in federal law that give individuals the ability to refuse to provide abortion and sterilization services, re-writing these laws to permit health care facilities and insurance plans to refuse to provide many of the most common forms of birth control.

Last Friday, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.), and Representative Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.), held a press conference at Bellevue Hospital in New York City, vowing to fight what Senator Clinton called “a gratuitous, unnecessary insult to the women of the United States of America.” Earlier in the week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), also spoke out publicly against the draft regulations, saying that “if the Administration goes through with this draft proposal, it will launch a dangerous assault on women’s health.” These comments from Congressional leaders have not gone unnoticed – when Speaker Pelosi’s statement was linked to on a social networking website, the resulting flow of web traffic crashed the Speaker’s homepage!

Today, a letter signed by more than 100 House members was delivered to President Bush and Michael Leavitt, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, urging them not to proceed with efforts to restrict access to contraceptive services. The letter was circulated by a coalition of pro-choice and pro-life advocates of family planning, including Reps. Nita Lowey, Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), and Diana DeGette (D-Colo.). A similar letter is circulating in the Senate, led by Sens. Clinton and Patty Murray (D-Wash.). NFPRHA continues to work with our allies on the Hill to ensure that the Administration gets the message that Congress will stand up to these efforts to limit access to contraceptive services.

Please write HHS Secretary Leavitt demanding that he halt all efforts to proceed with these draft regulations: send this letter today! And tell your friends and colleagues, as well. Thanks.

Gloria Feldt is the author of No Excuses: 9 Ways Women Can Change How We Think About Power. Buy the book here. Engage Gloria for a Speech or Workshop. Tweet @GloriaFeldt and connect on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Google+ Gloria is the co-founder (with Amy Litzenberger) of Take the Lead, a new initiative to prepare and propel women to leadership parity by 2025. Find them @takeleadwomen and on Facebook.

Latest posts by Gloria Feldt (Posts)

2 Responses to If Bush Decides Contraception is Abortion, it Must Be True, Right?

  1. Stacy says:

    It’s nice of the media to largely ignore this affront to science, medicine and common sense. They can’t walk and chew gum at the same time so they are tied up covering McCain having to re-write his NYT op-ed…

    LIke the South Dakota ruling the other day wasn’t bad enough (affirming the right of the state to force doctors to read a ridiculous script about how the woman will be severing a tie to a human being which is constitutionally recognized, etc. etc.), now this.

    The fact of the matter is, that Roe has come to mean very little these days due to the radical right wing strategy of death by a thousand cuts and to define birth control as abortion that is just a precursor to running rough-shod over Griswald etc.

    You can bet McCain is going to answer any question about reproductive rights with the misleading answer, “I am for letting the states decide” while he knows Bush is trying to make extremist changes in every aspect of our lives before he leaves office. I have never seen such a twisted intermingling of politics and science while the media sits back and goes, “ho-hum.” In addition, that the Executive Branch is using federal agencies to push it’s political and religious agenda, seems to possibly violate the Hatch Act-I’m going to go look that up.

    While there are various forms of birth control available to women, it would be nice if we could get the FDA to do it’s job and approve the pill for over-the-counter use. Hopefully, if Obama is elected he can try to un-do some of the damage of the Bush administration and allow scientific agencies like the CDC, FDA, and HHS to do their job based on science instead of a narrow religious/political ideology. Novel idea, huh? This also highlights the importance of having a democrat in the Oval Office to oversee the next round of judicial and federal agency appointments because McCain will be just like Bush if not worse.

Leave a Reply to this Post

Speak up early and often here at Heartfeldt. Post your comments freely. I already know what I think--it's your opinions that interest me. It goes without saying that obscene or threatening comments and comments that are not germane to the topic will be removed. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Thank you for your cooperation!